MCAS ballot question supporters pay $4K penalty to resolve late reporting accusations

01.07.2025    Boston Herald    7 views
MCAS ballot question supporters pay $4K penalty to resolve late reporting accusations

The group that backed a productive ballot question to end the use of the MCAS as a high school graduation requirement paid a penalty to resolve accusations that agents did not document million in contributions in a timely manner ahead of the November voting process The fight between the Massachusetts Teachers Association and business groups over the fate of the MCAS was the greater part expensive ballot question battle in Massachusetts during the referendum cycle with tens of millions flowing between the two sides according to state records But campaign finance regulators reported the Committee for High Standards Not High Stakes which was largely backed by the MTA did not summary in monetary donations and more than million in in-kind contributions in the days leading up to the ballot Although the committee accurately disclosed all of these contributions in its November th record the committee s failure to file the required late contribution reports frustrated the society s interest in accurate and timely disclosure of campaign finance activity during the relevant period Office of Campaign and Political Finance Director William Campbell wrote in a June letter A spokesperson for the Massachusetts Teachers Association did not promptly provide a response to a Herald inquiry Tuesday Ballot question committees must file reports with state regulators if they receive a contribution of or more during what s known as the late contribution reporting period that began Oct and ended Nov The reports are designed to document cash flowing in and out of ballot question committees in the days just before an referendum when spending can reach staggering amounts as supporters and opponents try to sway voters with last-minute pitches State regulators noted the committee backing the MCAS ballot question received a number of contributions during the later reporting period and filed two reports documenting the spending on Oct and Oct But the group did not disclose that it had received contributions totalling million during the late reporting period according to regulators The ballot question committee ultimately published the fundraising in a overview that was due on Balloting Day OCPF bureaucrats commented The receipt and utilization of these eleven contributions should have been disclosed in late contribution reports due within hours of receipt or utilization Campbell disclosed in his letter Since multiple late contributions can be broadcasted on a single summary at a minimum four additional reports should have been filed The Committee for High Standards Not High Stakes disclosed spending across and to back the question and receiving more than million in in-kind contributions for goods or services state material shows Opponents to the question largely business groups who formed the Protect Our Kids Future ballot question committee spent million in and and another in in-kind contributions in according to state material

Similar News

Commentary: Don Sweeney attempts to fix Bruins’ broken culture
Commentary: Don Sweeney attempts to fix Bruins’ broken culture

After a slew of signings on Tuesday, it is fair for Bruins’ fans to ask whether their team is any be...

01.07.2025 3
Read More
Mayor Karen Bass accuses Trump of waging 'an all o
Mayor Karen Bass accuses Trump of waging 'an all out assault on Los Angeles'

The mayor's remarks came a day after Trump's Department of Justice sued the city, saying its sanctua...

01.07.2025 3
Read More
Aria Pedraza launches the Midwest Rave Culture Archive with a Ping Tom Park party
Aria Pedraza launches the Midwest Rave Culture Archive with a Ping Tom Park party

On Saturday, July 5, the brand-new Midwest Rave Culture Archive will host a launch party and fundrai...

01.07.2025 5
Read More